Antigua St John's - Wednesday’s High Court ruling overturning Sir Gerald Watt's forced removal from the chairmanship of the Antigua and Barbuda Electoral Commission (ABEC).
The court ruled that Prime Minister Baldwin Spencer and Governor General Louise Lake-Tack had acted unlawfully when they removed Sir Gerald and replaced him with Juno Samuel.
The reaction from the government has been swift and strident. UPP spokesman, Senator Joanne Massiah, poured contempt on Justice Jennifer Remy’s ruling. She said the judge's ruling that nullified all decisions taken while Samuel was chairman was, in her view, unreasonable.
“Juno Samuel as an individual did not make any decision on his own, but ABEC, as a whole, made the decisions,” Massiah said on the UPP-aligned Crusader Radio.
“The Commission was properly constituted quorum-wise. If we follow that logic, anything the Commission did from the day Samuel took the chair last year has no effect. Would you throw the entire country into chaos that way?” she asked.
|
|
Download Caribarena's Android App
Click To Download
26 Comments In This Article
RE: UPP Reacts to Court Decision
Samuel,then they are obviously null and void.
It's back to square one.
Pinky
@ Vere C. Bird III - Correction
Skyewill
Chaos all around
Joanne it is the actions of your PM and his cabinet that "threw the entire country into chaos. Not the judge who simply heard all the facts and made her judgement on the facts she had presented before her. This UPP administration is full of "lawyers" yet they always seem to have a problem with the judiciary, judges and judgements that is not in their favour.
Joanne the chaos started when your party decided to preempt the courts decision and do as ya'll like.
If the PM is the minister responsible for elections the buck stops with him not Sir Gerald or the Commission who by the way were cleared of all wrong doing already in the government investigation and report.
The Wadadli Blogger
RE: UPP Reacts to Court Decision
WAWA
listen to me and vote correctly
The pm had no logical or reasonable reasons to have by-pass the bureaucratic processes specified in the appropriate laws to have acted with haste, hurry and SOLELY to remove a constitutional rights protector (commissioner).
This government will allow their hatred and emotion affect their decision making which will leave us the people starving, poor and victimizing each other for food, clothes, cars, and things most of us believe we deserve over the other.
my way of helping
moral fiber gone missing?
jeb
Reader
Inept Opposition
Wrong
Woman
RE: UPP Reacts to Court Decision
Vere C. Bird III
RE: UPP Reacts to Court Decision
Her comment reminds me of the comment made by MP Baptiste when Justice Blenman ruled in the election case.
I would recommend that the politicians think before they open their mouths.
"Let's fix the little things before we attempt to fix the big things."
fnpsr
cheese
Flunky
Bernard
Brown Sugar
Senator- read the ruling
Dig It
RE: UPP Reacts to Court Decision
WAWA
RE: UPP Reacts to Court Decision
Cool Ruler
UPP must go
pedro
Now we see why Joanne is a failure
Obviously, if Sir Gerald was illegally removed then anything Juno Samuels signed as Chairman is null and void, even if it was based on a decision of the Commission. If the Commission was illegally constituted then anything it did was also illegal. This is common sense. In the case of the firings and transfers, Juno did these on his own as he claimed he had executive privilege.
Judge Dredd
Illegal appointment=Ill egal actions
MaeStro
RE: UPP Reacts to Court Decision
The problem from the beginning with this case is that PM Spencer acted illogically, arbitrarily and unreasonably when he terminated Mr. Watt as chairman. Now he has to suffer the consequences of his poor decision-making . Stop blaming the judge. She is merely correcting the mess the PM and his minions created. Next time, the PM should think carefully before he acts…and more importantly, get “good” legal advice.
Antiguan Abroad
RE: UPP Reacts to Court Decision
First of all, meetings that were conducted with a quorum and the chairman was present...his vote/approval of any decision is nullified and therefore those meetings were improper & illegal. (The law speaks to composition of a quorum). Furthermore, in any other decision that Mr. Samuel's vote was the deciding factor for a majority vote, his vote had no effect and the majority of votes will now tie with those opposed...causi ng they ayes and nays to be even (remember the composition of the Commission totals an odd number). Thirdly anything he signed is null and void. And finally, the law impliedly states that a commission cannot function without a chairman, now if there was never a chairman (such as this case), and no one was appointed or acted in that post, any decisions made is therefore improper. So, that is the basic logic that I see that the Judge used to nullify all decisions taken while Mr. Samuel was present.
J.A.F. -law student
out the loop or a liar
Quote:Paddy James, who sat on the commission during the illegal chairman's tenure yesterday stated :
Quote:..
tenman
Throw the entire country into chaos
Skyewill
IS THIS LADY FOR REAL?
I AM SO DISAPPOINTED IN "MY LADY". IF YOUR PRIME MINISTER IS GOING TO APPEAL ( WHICH I DOUBT) JUST DO THAT, NO NEED TO ATTACK AN ESTABLISH PILLAR OF OUT SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT. I AM SO DISAPPOINTED, MY LADY YOUR ARE BETTER THAN THAT.
OO7
Take ya licks & keep it moving
ALP PICKNEY
my reasoning, again. part 2
Such direct adverse interference can (and should be deem) as tyranny, "saddam husseinism" (i made that word up), oppressive, dictatorism, despot, bully, authoritarianism.
Any direct and adverse actions taken that will adversely affect our democracy, must be not be tolerated and it is sad that an attorney, who is also a representative of the people would try to accept such action. It is there leader first and the people of Antigua and Barbuda constitutional rights after.
It all boils down to money, power and you will see how evil and selfish we all get. I am not kidding, i can close my eyes and make this decision. What decision on earth juno made, that is much more important that the human and constitutional rights of the people?
I am demanding a reply from the Senator Joanne Massiah
my way of helping
my reasoning, again.
This logic, would more apply to what the UPP leader and the governor general did, in making such an illogical, unreasonable and illegal removal of Mr. Watts.
Because juno was at the helm of the commission and as a "head", he had a leadership (guidance) role with the commision, any act that he participated in, would be a violation and should be null and void, as he never had any authority to participate in such discussion and decision making (whether minor or major).
It is like, meeting me on the street and putting me with the two appeal judges because you think i am logical and smart and would make good decisions on legal matters but any decision I participate in making would be a complete violation, as I was not legally appoint as an appeals judge and such action has significant affect constitutional rights (you do not play with constitutional matters).
my way of helping
RSS