- Details
-
Latest
-
Thursday, 24 November 2011 02:30
-
By caribarena news
The US Congress has written to the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) demanding action in the payment of victims of the alleged R Allen Stanford Ponzi Scheme.
The letter was sent to Chairman Orlan Johnson on November 22.
The Congress wants a "satisfactory update" or a decision on the matter by December 15. Failing this, it has threatened to recommend a formal inquiry by the House Financial Services Committee.
However, the Stanford International Victims Group has noted that concern is only being expressed for the US-based victims.
We reprint the letter below in full.
Mr. Orlan M, Johnson
Chairman, Securities Investor Protection Corporation
805 15th Street, N.W. Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20005-2215
Dear Chairman Johnson,
As you are Well aware, on J une 15th of this year the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) concluded that certain victims of the Ponzi scheme perpetuated by the Stanford Financial Group were qualified and entitled to restitution for their losses by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (S[PC).1 This decision came after more than two years of dedicated and unwavering advocacy by the victims in our states, and was seen at that time as the news that every one of the thousands of Stanford’s victims had been hoping and praying for since this tragedy first began.
Following the June 15th announcement by the SEC, SIPC President & CEO Stephen Harbeck issued a statement the same day announcing that the SIPC board would "review the (SEC’s) referral, and analyze the SEC ’s underlying documentation as quickly as possible."2 In a statement released July 1“, the SEC stated that it “expects its Board of Directors (referring to the SIPC) to announce on or about September 15, 20] I its decision about the referral provided by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the Stanford Group Company.”
However, after the September 15th date passed without resolution of this matter, you issued a statement on behalf of the SIPC (which it appears now cannot be located anywhere on the SIPC website) on September 16th stating: “The board of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) is continuing its careful review of the many and complex issues in the Stanford case. We fully appreciate the gravity of this matter and remain committed to reviewing it thoroughly and with all delißerate speed. With this-issue still under advisement, the SIPC Board will make an announcement when its consideration ofthe matter is concluded.
The victims of Stanford’s crimes have demonstrated enormous patience and cooperation throughout every step of this terrible ordeal. However, they have been left in the dark throughout the SIPC’ s deliberative process to such an extent that it begs the question of whether the SIPC is anything but completely unconcerned with their plight. Many, if not most of the Stanford victims are blue collar workers who sawthe retirement fund they had spent a lifetime accumulating vanish the day Mr. Stanford’ s actions finally
1 SEC News Release: SEC Concludes That Certain Stanford Ponzi Scheme Investors Are Entitled to Protections of SIPA (6/15/11) nressf 201lf2DJ_1-129.htrn
3 Statement of Orlan Johnson, Chairman, SIPC (9/16/11)came to light. The lives and futures they had planned have been thrown into chaos ever since, first by MrStanford and his associates, then by an overzealous and careless court appointed Receiver, followed by a long and protracted deliberation process by the SEC, and now by the SIPC.
We understand and respect that the Stanford matter is a complex and complicated one, involving thousands of accounts and hundreds of millions of dollars in lost assets. However, after more than 22 weeks, the Stanford victims and the American people Want and deserve answers. Accordingly, we
respectfully request that you take the necessary steps to enhance your efforts as needed to bring this matter to a swift conclusion.
If we or the victims we represent can be of any assistance to you in terms of providing the information or research you require to complete this task, we stand ready to assist you. However, if we do not receive a final decision or a satisfactory update on your progress by December 15"', a full three months after your original deadline and six months after the SEC handed this matter over to you, we will feel compelled to recommend to Chairman Spencer Bachus (R-AL) and Ranking Member Barney Frank (D-MA) of the House Financial Services Committee that they initiate a formal inquiry of the handling of this matter.
To be clear, direct Congressional involvement and hearings are not our desired outcome to this situation. What we want to see is the victims in our states made Whole to the best extent possible under SIPC, as soon as possible. However, if the SIPC continues to delay their decision, we will use every asset at our disposal to provide assistance and guidance to those We represent.
We look forward to your prompt reply on this matter.
16 Comments In This Article
RE: US Congress Demands Solution for Stanford Investors
piky head
@Truth
Vitter may try to get some votes out of it, and the GOAB (labor, upp, communists, baptists exstestentualis ts, whatever frekin'party) may want to make it vanish, but SIB was an antiguan bank.
There is no responsibility, no compinsation, no authority, no recourse. THATS ANTGUA.
NeedToKnowBasis
RE: US Congress Demands Solution for Stanford Investors
The letter makes it pretty clear its for Americans only, references to:
Quote:and
Quote:Should clear up any doubts they might have!
Truth
Antiguan Abroad
It's really no big deal. They're only threatning to request a committee investigation. The first thing the investigation will turn up is that SIB was an Antiguan bank and is not eligable for US SIPC coverage.
NeedToKnowBasis
RE: US Congress Demands Solution for Stanford Investors
Antiguan Abroad
RE: US Congress Demands Solution for Stanford Investors
Antiguan Abroad
Antiguan Abroad
The letter itself has Sen. David Vitters fingerprints all over it. He is in the unenviable position of being a Republican "christian" lawmaker who was caught in the DC Madam scandal. The few votes he gets from SIB investors in his state could be the difference between re-election and a real job.
NeedToKnowBasis
Antiguan Abroad
I am however embar**ed by the behavior of these congressmen. To put individual constituants' interests in front of the law, and the good of the country as a whole, for political gain is somthing Antiguan politicians are frequently accused of. For US politicians to exhibit this behavior is truely disapointing.
NeedToKnowBasis
@Skyewill
Oh, and they did make it into a movie: in 1996, followed by two sequels.
NeedToKnowBasis
@skyewill
2. I'm not sure what that means. In a body of over 500 people there will always be rogues, you seem to be agreeing with me.
3. Blackmail is a form of extorsion. I'm happy you're proud to be a black male. Was there a point?
4. All postponements in Sir Allen's case have been at his request.
5. I was just discussing this with Lee Harvey Oswald at Area 51 the other day. I thought he was about to come to blows with Jimmy Hoffa over it until Bigfoot broke it up.
6. Ha! I use a glass bong (less particulates), but clearly the organic NorCal bud I'm smoking has nothing on your African Keif!
Happy Thanksgiving!
NeedToKnowBasis
RE: US Congress Demands Solution for Stanford Investors
Antiguan Abroad
FREE ALLAN STANDFORD
skyewill
@ NeedToKnowBasis
2. I have known 1 congressman to cause major problems for the evil ones
3. Blackmail? OK, yes I am, and that's BlackMALE
4. The false imprisonment of Allan Standford for such a long time is unconstitutiona l and wicked for he has not been found guilty of anything, yet!
5. Standford was setup. He had the assets to back those claims and was building. This was not Ponzi scheme that's BS, CA, can I write b u l l - **?
6. Put down the spliff, you had enough for today.
skyewill
RE: US Congress Demands Solution for Stanford Investors
English Professor
RE: US Congress Demands Solution for Stanford Investors
Still, not even a significant minority.
NeedToKnowBasis
RE: US Congress Demands Solution for Stanford Investors
It was Sen. David "DC Madam" Vitter (R-LA) who first tried to get coverage for his constituants accounts in an Antiguan bank. Unfortunately, his only weapon, like most Republicans, was obstructionism, in this case holding up important SEC appointments until the SEC issued the letter refrenced above. The SIPC however, is under no such threat of blackmail, and will ultimately refuse coverage, even for US citizens, of deposits in an Antiguan bank.
NeedToKnowBasis
RSS