Antigua and Barbuda

Partly Cloudy
81°F
High: 81°F
Low: 77°F
 

Browne Not Satisfied With Lovell's Response

Browne Not Satisfied With Lovell's ResponseAntigua St John's - City West MP Gaston Browne has defended his alternate suggestions for the State Insurance Corporation. This followed Finance Minister Harold Lovell's assertion on Tuesday that while Browne's plan had merit, it was not as satisfactory as the government's plan for divestment.

Now, Browne has issued further details to support his case.

His latest statement is reprinted below.

Hon. Gaston Browne in a media statement said that Minister Harold Lovell has failed miserably to support his assertion that the bilateral sale of State Insurance Corporation  (SIC) will result in “best value for the assets and shares” of SIC and has called upon the Minister to provide his justification. Browne responded that ‘Perhaps the Minister meant best value for the UPP cronies and so-called “strategic partner,” certainly not best value for the Government and people of Antigua & Barbuda.’ 

MP Browne provided the following rationale to justify the superiority of the  proposed ALP’s divestment model to transform State Insurance into a publicly traded company with the Government and people of Antigua & Barbuda retaining controlling interest (51 percent) of the shares.   Here follows his rationale:

1.    The strategic partner which most likely will be a foreign entity would result in the effective foreignisation of the ownership and control of State Insurance Corporation despite the best efforts of the Government to limit the foreign strategic partner’s shares to 49 percent.

2.    UPP’s model will result in the net repatriation of profits to a foreign country.

3.    The very structure of the bilateral sale will result in the cannibalization of the assets of SIC and would reduce the value of the firm.

4.    Reduction or elimination of the corporation’s goodwill and the value of SIC.
5.    The bilateral sale is far less transparent than the listing process and could give rise to certain corrupt practices including collusion from insiders thereby reducing the realisable value of SIC.

6.    A public listing could result in a share premium of say 25 to 30 percent which will maximize the value of the firm as opposed to a bi-lateral placement.


7.    The Strategic Partner would seek a bargain price and more than likely would demand corporate tax holidays and the waiver of withholding taxes for several years, thereby reducing the net realizable value of SIC.

8.    The opportunity to increase the communal benefits of SIC, enjoyed by the Government and people of Antigua & Barbuda will be lost and the existing benefits would be reduced or eliminated after the Government loses effective control and ownership.  This will result in:

•    A reduction in credit to the Government to cover premium payments and in increased cash flow pressures on public finances to cover premium payments as and when they become due and payable.

•    Elimination of an average of EC$10M annually in sustainable profits

•    Opportunity Cost of tens of millions of dollars from the recommended strategic expansion into the Caribbean and beyond.

9.    The concentration of the oligopolistic insurance market will result in higher premiums and Government will lose the capacity to manipulate State Insurance premiums to regulate insurance premiums and keep them affordable.

10.    Significant dilution of the popular (communal) national ownership of SIC, elimination of the present ownership pride, and depravation of the opportunity to create a world class publicly traded insurance company.

11.    Displacement and foreignisation of SIC’s Management.

The MP for City West further argued that:

A publicly traded SIC would have access to capital to support its business expansion or market penetration or diversification strategy into property development to include residential housing, commercial development possibly to include hotels and shopping plazas to the benefit of the state.

Unlike the assertion of Harold Lovell, a strategic alliance partner need not be a substantial equity holder.  The strategic partner could be a minor shareholder of State Insurance or alternatively, could be sold redeemable preference shares to preserve the effective control and ownership of SIC by the citizenry.

State Insurance would have sufficient financial resources to purchase the relevant skills and technology that may be needed to support its market penetration strategy.

It is important for the Government and people to maintain a controlling interest in State Insurance in order to protect the best interest of the citizenry and to create value (wealth) though the earning of profits from its proposed overseas expansion for the collective benefit of all Antiguans & Barbudans.


He said that any concerns that the government may have about conflicts in government regulating and competing in the insurance market could be resolved by the introduction of a competition authority with the supporting legal and regulatory framework.  

MP Browne challenged the Hon. Minister to provide tangible supporting arguments to justify the impracticability of the ALP’s proposed divestment model and the superiority of the ill advised bilateral sale and total foreignisation of State Insurance Corporation.  In the absence of compelling reasons to support the bilateral sale, he said that the UPP Government has a moral obligation to review their model to provide best value in the best interest of the population.

As an aside, MP Browne said that that the coincidence in the timing of the IFC’s investment in Sagicor for expansion into the Caribbean, and the time line for the sale of State Insurance is rather curious. He called upon Minister Lovell to disclose to the nation if Sagicor is the undisclosed strategic partner in waiting.

Hits: 1393

16 Comments In This Article   

HEADER   

@Fred

#16 Dig It » 2011-04-07 12:11

Fred, it is nothing new with Lovell! He is still getting advice from consultants on the matter before he responds in the next few weeks! This is what happens when our politicians are lead by the hand! Everything has to be written for them, including, what time to take lunch? While you waiting on Lovell, I am still waiting for my friend Skyewill to get back to me. By now, I sure he has enough time to tell me what he is thinks or he if changes his mind about the MP Browne? Skyewill, it been two days now, and don't let me you "can't focus right now!"
0
0
+
−

Dig It

#15 Fred » 2011-04-07 09:31

Another day and no response from Lovell. Hmmm! Caribarena should call upon him to respond.
0
0
+
−

Fred

#14 Anonymous » 2011-04-07 04:09

People just be patient, the race is not for the swift. Minister Lovell is not like Dr. Cort. We are taking our time to work on his response which will blow gaston out of the waters for once and for all and bring the divestment debate to rest.
0
0
+
−

Anonymous

Waiting on Lovell's response

#13 UPP Supporter » 2011-04-07 00:35

I am waiting on a response from Lovell. If after a few days (even though Gaston took minutes), the I would think that Lovell's silence really indicates that he has no clue what he is doing. He is just following rather than leading the process. Gaston, on the other hand, has impressed me that he knows that he;s talking about. At least he has detailed his plan and has defended it. Its a shame that Lovell who I voted for cannot do the same.
0
0
+
−

UPP Supporter

@winston

#12 pedro » 2011-04-06 23:45

Really cant understand what Lester has done to you, but let's not get personal.
Second perhaps only to his father, Lester as PM of this country has contributed more than any other to date. The only problem with Lester is that he is a Bird, a champion name in the cause of justice and liberation against hunger and poverty in this country. In other words, the family has been just champions for too long, though not without fault. So we got tired of that and tried someone else, nothing wrong with that, but we can be honest and objective and give Jack his jacket, Lester is a deserving and worthy former and future PM.
I dare you to objectively compare the two...Spencer and Lester, using all the best attributes of Spencer, and I will leave you to be the judge.
My final comment and I say this without reservation.... ............... Lester is a better human being than Spencer.
0
0
+
−

pedro

#11 Winston » 2011-04-06 21:23

Amazing! I am speechless. Brown, I never had any doubt about your competence was just worried about your association with those holligans in the ALP. You were challenged to produce a plan yesterday and you presented a well thought out plan in minutes. Wow! that was amazing. I am still gonna give Harold the benefit of the doubt that he would come with a better counter plan. Harold Please dont let me down. I am a UPP supporter even though I like Brown. The ALP is cleverly fighting to win public opinion on this one, I dont want the ALP to win this fight which would benefit the likes of Lester Bird, I know you can do it Harold!
0
0
+
−

Winston

Excellent Plan Mr Browne

#10 joshua » 2011-04-06 15:35

I am impressed that at last someone has come forward to put a proper plan in place for this entity! This swhy we need a government of national unity, like what Minsiter Daniel suggested, to bring to the surface the best ideas. I support this one! sorry Minister lovell but you don't know what you are talking about. Step aside for the better man!
0
0
+
−

joshua

@Tenman

#9 Dig It » 2011-04-06 13:10

Tenman, sometimes we have to give Jack its Jacket! And, I believe the MP made a good case, which I believe is in the best interest of the nation, and some of us need to put party colors aside, and really look at this plan, compared to the government's plan! I know some in the government's camp feels hostage going with Lovell's plan! Yet, they have no choice but to accept it because some of them know that the strategic partner has the government rapped around its fingers! Tell my friend Patriotic to hang in there and just bite the bullet for now!
0
0
+
−

Dig It

I need to know

#8 Me » 2011-04-06 12:55

Is this another "beat deal" like when Lovell sold off Royal Antigua or one like when he bought that building at woods or is it like when they bought Benjies derilic building or is it Foodcity? someone please tell me
0
0
+
−

Me

@Skyewill

#7 Dig It » 2011-04-06 12:49

Skyewill, do you have a change of heart about MP Browne plan or you're still lead astray with the government's own? Yet, do not worry I am not going to make you drink on this one because I got nothing but love for you! You still have time to look at the plan again and get back to me not Lovell!
0
0
+
−

Dig It

#6 Beauty » 2011-04-06 11:11

Is this a news site or a he say she say site?
0
0
+
−

Beauty

answers part 3 (final)

#5 tenman » 2011-04-06 10:29

The government has basically stated that the present method is best because it will allow them to remove and separately sell non core assets. It will allow them to find an entity with enough cash to purchase the shares but also to put more moneys (outside of the sale of shares) into SIC to take it to the next level. This is all about government getting short term moneys quickly. MP Browne's suggestion will only deal with providing SIC with more funds, it will not deal with helping government get the quick cash it needs now.

..
0
0
+
−

tenman

answers part 2

#4 tenman » 2011-04-06 10:22

7 - Why wasn’t the first option for divestment that of selling the company to the general public?

As mentioned above, the initial review highlighted the importance of technical expertise, economies of scale and significant cash injection. In the absence of these factors the sale of SIC shares to the general public is not likely to guarantee the long term sustainability of the company.

obtai ned from http://caribarena.com/antigua/business/business-news/8400-state-insurance-details-revealed.html

..
0
0
+
−

tenman

answers part 1

#3 tenman » 2011-04-06 10:21

6 - Would other divestment options be considered? What about a listing of SIC on regional financial markets?

Pleas e note, however, that an initial review performed by the Divestment Unit found that SIC would benefit from the technical expertise – which would lead to immediate improvements of the Corporation’s operations - as well as the economies of scale and capital a partnership with a reputable insurance investor would provide. This same initial review also mentioned the likelihood that such an option would lead to a higher valuation of the Corporation as it would be **sed both on its own merits and on these likely benefits.



..
0
0
+
−

tenman

#2 Maria V » 2011-04-06 08:56

Gaston not because we are friends but I am really impressed with your intellect. I like your response, lets see what Lovell has to say.
0
0
+
−

Maria V

I'm reading Tenman

#1 Skyewill » 2011-04-06 08:40

I can't focus right now but I am studying it and Thank you Mr. Brown. That's the way to do it. I read a few and agree with a few for now. Lets just see I'lll keep reading
0
0
+
−

Skyewill

Add comment

Follow us on Facebook

Spotlight on Opinon

Previous Next
Response- Not a Caribbean Man
Antigua St. Jon's - Sir Ron, thank you for that insightful piece.  It raises a ...  Read more

Latest Business News

Search Directory


Directory Listings


JAKAZA Group Enterprises

Providing Business Services to all Businesses. Including Staff transport, Concierge services, Personal shoppers, Brokerage, Heavy Equip, Project ...

Category: Business


Treetops Entertainment Ltd

Treetops, Located in Coolidge, on the Northern end of Antigua, is a magical combination of food, drink, plants and furniture in a tranquil location. ...

Category: Restaurants

App

Android LogoDownload Caribarena's Android App Click To Download

Find us on Twitter!